Unfortunately, crime is a part of life. It’s been asked many times, does crime pay and the response is; indeed it does. Many members of our society depend on crime for their livelihood. Judges, lawyers, police, etc. derive their income directly from crime and the individuals that commit crimes. However, most people have no idea about the criminal mind and the reasons that people commit crimes in the first place.
Got questions about crime? Each week I answer the top 10 questions about crime asked on Quora.com
Good Evening Readers!!
Once again our friends at Quora.com has hit me with 10 new questions to share with you.
Enjoy the top 10 questions of the week beginning December 16, 2018
10) Tim Webster requested your answer to this
Unfortunately the current prison system is more about punishment than rehabilitation. Rehabilitation is about ending a way of life by creating possibilities for a new and better way of life. The fact of the matter is; prison is a business, similar to that of the pharmaceutical business. There is no money in the cure. The money is in the treatment. If cancer is cured, it loses its financial viability. Therefore the treatment of the disease creates a lucrative business enterprise for all parties except the patient. If offenders are rehabilitated during prison stays, the recidivism rate drops thereby ending the need for many prisons. As long as convicts are punished for their crimes, nothing is learned and recidivism rises creating a lucrative business enterprise for all parties; except the convict.
9) David Crestfield requested your answer to this
Cell phones are not permitted for those incarcerated. They present an incredible security risk and are considered contraband. However, some prisoners do have cell phones by way of them being brought in via nefarious means
8) Peter Creed requested your answer to this
I am so glad that you asked me this question and I hope that other hiring managers follow me on social media. As a hiring manager you are placed in a position of great power; more power than I think you realize. You potentially hold the keys to some people’s future, freedom and lives.
When you see that the job applicant has picked yes, decide what you would’ve done had that question not been on the application. Based on the job candidate’s application/resume; does he/she have the qualifications necessary to fill the open position. If not, you know what to do. However, if the person’s experience and education make the person a potentially viable candidate, grant him an interview. Without being judgmental or jumping to conclusions, allow the candidate to explain the circumstances of their conviction. If hired, does their presence in the work place jeopardize your business in any way? If not, give the individual the same consideration as you would anyone else. Remember, he/she has paid their debt to society and should be looked at as simply a person applying to the open position; nothing more, nothing less.
7) Elec Hill requested your answer to this
I don’t know if you’ve heard me speak or read my book but as I’ve indicated in the past; yes there is a direct correlation between addiction and serial murder. In both situations it is the obsession and compulsion that serves as the driving force within the mind of the addict as well as the serial murderer.
6) Katherine Worden requested your answer to this
After giving this much thought and though it may sound corny but it would definitely be The Black Dahlia Murder. Never has there been as a single murder a case that has attracted the attention of not only the nation but of the world. The media hype that surrounded this case is unprecedented; as a matter of fact, I know of no single case since this that has the notoriety and following of The Black Dahlia murder. Solving a murder case that involved an extensive investigation that produced over 150 persons of interest and a total of 60 confessions that, not to mention, occurred nearly 72 years ago would be the case that I would, if I could; choose to solve.
5) Brittany DeCarlo requested your answer to this
I believe that the
true fascination comes from people seeing an aspect of societal life that is
not normally explored. For example, people have an interest in crime and punish
due to the fact that the people, for the most part, are hard-working
individuals with a respect for life. Most people are not faced with any aspect
of crime in their day to day lives. That being said, people have an innate
interest in seeing how those that live differently from what is known as the
norm. The incomprehensibility of people dealing with crime or the criminal
element regularly attracts our interest. Going deeper down the rabbit-hole;
murder, the most taboo offense in our society, shocks our sense of humanity and
makes us question the logic of those that commit serial murder.
4) Michael Henen requested your answer to this
Regardless of the sentence length, the most important rule of prison is remembering where you are and why you are there. Do not forget that you are in prison and begin involving yourself in “prison politics,” and become aligned with this individual or that individual exclusively. Friendships will occur naturally but do not go out of your way to become friends with any one person or group of people. Remember you came there to do your time and go home.
3) Krish Patel requested your answer to this
It depends on what part of the movie you are asking about. If you are inquiring about the lonesomeness, the missing of family and friends and the days and nights of constantly wishing you had it to do over again; then hell yeah it’s scary. However, if you are asking in reference to the movies depiction of prison life as being filled with constant rapes, extortion, daily beat downs and gang wars; don’t forget the corrupt prison guards who are just as vile as the inmates they’re in charge of; then no, it’s nothing like that.
Movies are here to
entertain you, but here is the real life of most prison bids. Almost 70% of
people incarcerated are non-violent offenders. This means that most people
serving time will go home eventually; therefore, most inmates try not engage in
activities that will cause them to remain incarcerated any longer than their
sentence dictates. Other than the occasional argument between cellmates, usually
inmates get through their bids without any major infractions.
2) Idris Abdullah requested your answer to this ·
The reason they are so uniquely traumatizing is the fact that there is nothing unique about them. I mean that they can happen anywhere. In other situations we take steps to prepare for or prevent violent assaults. Whether learning self-defense or carrying our own firearms, we establish a sense of security to prepare for a violent assault, should it happen. There is no prevention from being a victim of a drive by.
1)Kathleen Albright requested your answer to
The individual that you are interested in writing to should be found on the convicting state’s department of corrections’ inmate locater. Once you find out where the inmate is located as well as their inmate identification number then you can write the inmate. If the person is in federal custody you would go to the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Prisons’ website
THAT’S WHY I’M HERE!!!!!
A New Week, 10 New Questions from Quora.com Readers
These are the questions from the week beginning 12/02/2018
10) Jason Sakamoto requested your answer to this
There have been many people whose lives have done a complete 180 due to their time in prison. Once incarcerated these individuals chose to use their time to focus on making a positive change in their lives whether it was gaining an education, learning a trade or making their minds up that enough is enough and that they will never find themselves in their current situation again.
9) M.Vincent Holguin requested your answer to this
Crime rate is defined as the amount of crime committed in an area based on that given area’s population.
8) James Cox requested your answer to this
Unfortunately, no you are not automatically compensated for the time that was taken from you. Once exonerated, the accused must file a law suit against the state and proceed with this action until an accepted settlement offer is made or a final determination concerning culpability and compensation amount is determined by a judge.
7) Lydia Mimiaga requested your answer to this
Oddly enough, I am pro-capital punishment. However, capital punishment should be implemented in situations where the defendant is not only undoubtedly guilty (DNA, multiple eyewitness accounts, etc.) but admits guilt without the slightest bit of remorse. I have seen cases where the defendant all but admits that they not only killed the victim(s) and since they knew that the death penalty was not a possibility; conducted themselves in an arrogant fashion in open court, even going as far as to disrespect the family of the victim. Also, guilt proven by the above-mentioned manners in the murder of children should be punished by death.
The first thing I would do is redesign the bail/ pre-trial system. Our current system requires that despite guilt or innocence; if arrested, an individual must provide a cash bail to be released. If that bond amount cannot be paid, the individual remains incarcerated until the final determination of the case thereby penalizing a potentially innocent individual for being poor.
The legal system does that intentionally knowing that if the defendant remains incarcerated, he/she is more likely to plead guilty to charges, despite his innocence or guilt, simply to get out of jail. In doing this, the court saves the county/state the costs of a trial and nullifies the defendant potentially being found innocent. Our current system requires that the defendant is held hostage until his/her ransom is paid or until the defendant submits to the will of the prosecution; despite the facts of the case. Furthermore, after being forced to enter a plea of guilty, the defendant is then charged with court costs and fines.
Statistics show a stark difference in conviction rates between defendants that fight their cases on bond compared to those forced to defend themselves in court while incarcerated.
5) Daniel Leahy requested your answer to this
I’ve had 6-7 prison cell mates as well as countless cell mates in county jail. Some I had more in common with than others; but in each instance we shared a mutual respect for personal: beliefs, space and property; therefore we were cool and I never had a problem with a cell mate. I’ve had more problems with college roommates than with prison cell mates.
4) Angel Tenebroso requested your answer to this
Several different factors determine this. When an individual goes to prison they are evaluated by medical doctors as well as psychologists or psychiatrists. It is their determination, the length of the prison term and the facts surrounding the conviction case that dictates what security level of a prison is necessary to house a murderer or any inmate for that matter.
3) Davidson Julot requested your answer to this
Generally, drug trafficking is considered a blue-collar crime, especially on the state level. If federal intervention in the case is made and the charges extend further than the basic hand to hand street transactions, then the case can be considered white collar. Terms such as conspiracy, enterprise andR.I.C.O. changes the perception of drug trafficking into white-collar crime.
2) Arnold Pope requested your answer to this
Hi Arnold:Unless there are extenuating circumstances, usually the crime scene isreleased after a period of 2-5 days. The lead detective dictates how long thescene of the crime is on lock down. They generally try to collect evidenceexpeditiously as time is an enemy to evidence collection.
1)Idris Abdullah requested your answer to this
The most common mistakes made by new inmates is coming in trying to be the toughest guy on the deck. There is always that one guy that has watched too much television and thinks someone is going to approach him in an offensive manner. This guy comes in giving everyone, (guards, staff, other inmates) a hard time and wants so much for other inmates to think he is a lot tougher than he really is. Two things that is true about prison, one is that phonies are easily sniffed out and two, you will get anything that you are looking for. The inmate gives off an air that he is looking for trouble and 9 times out of 10 he not only finds it; he also finds that he is nowhere as tough as he portrayed himself to be. He soon gets his ass whipped and news quickly spreads around the yard. From that point he is labelled a punk and is treated with disrespect by everyone he encounters in that facility.
These are the questions from the week beginning 11/26/2018
10) Catherine MacLeod requested your answer to this
Generalizing and labeling, entertainment media is worse for society than any particular genre. The effect on society that a genre has is relative to the individual that is taking the information in. Most people can take in a good crime story or movie, be entertained and keep it moving. The fact of the matter is that in our society we have many individuals that suffer from a myriad of undiagnosed mental health issues. It is impossible to know what will send an individual spiraling into a world of depravity; regardless of the genre. So no; true crime books and documentaries are not bad for society as some people claim. Allowing undiagnosed mentally ill individuals the ability to obtain books and movies that may set them off at any moment is what’s bad for society.
9) Angela Twardosz requested your answer to this
There was no 1 particular case that initially peaked my interests. I guess I’ve always had an interest in crime and trying to understand why I was always drawn to it. It became more in 2012. I was on what’s commonly known as, ”house arrest.” For anyone that’s unfamiliar with the term, house arrest is the street name for electronic monitoring, (E.M.). Instead of jail, an individual serves their incarceration/pre-trial period at home with an electronic anklet and electronic receiver binding them to their home. (See Antman and the Wasp asPaul Rudd illustrates the fine points of house arrest)During this time I came across the channel Investigation Discovery and became familiar with their subject matter. I was totally smitten with the channel but soon noticed that most of the individuals highlighted were White. I ended up spending a year and a half on E.M. and during this time I sought out and researched the existence of Black serial killers which led to me writing the book, The Darker Side of Evil, the creation of my blog, Reignmaker1911.com, more recently my YouTube channel as well as my transformation from master-criminal to expert in criminal behavior.
8) Shirley Day requested your answer to this
The fact is Shirley there is no such thing as anonymous samples. The general public is not required to have DNA samples on file. Under the law, every felon sentenced on or after Aug. 22, 2002, must provide a DNA sample, whether they are under the supervision of the Department of Corrections or county jail or probation. DNA samples collected at a crime scene is run against the database of pre-collected samples in hopes of a match. During investigations, authorities may require that person’s of interest to voluntarily submit a DNA sample in an effort to include or exclude an individual from the case’s suspect pool.
7) San Goshi requested your answer to this
We don’t have to think hard to come up with serial killers that were never identified. Jack the Ripper, the Zodiac Killer, etc. top that long list. Media outlets come up with witty nicknames to identify otherwise nameless and faceless perpetrators of their infamous acts of depravity. Once a killer has been definitely and definitively identified as the perpetrator, Iknow of no situation where the serial killer was not charged and arrested..However, when it comes to being identified, arrested but not convicted; that’s a horse of a totally different color. There have been cases throughout recorded history that, despite the evidence levied against the defendant; the killer managed to avoid being convicted.
6) Hugo Quinonez requested your answer to this
Crime is a word used to describe any infraction of a law or set of laws instituted and accepted by a group of individuals to establish order and maintain peace among this same group of individuals. These infractions can normally be divided into 2 subgroups; misdemeanors and felonies. Misdemeanors are minor infractions whereas felonies are considered major infractions and carry more severe penalties for their violations.
5) Ju Chop requested your answer to this
Unfortunately Ju, the answer to this question is yes. Most of the police officers that you see in the streets, especially uniformed officers in cars; are out there doing what you asked. They get behind random cars, run their plates and hope some manner of infraction comes back. It is perfectly legal for police officers to run your plates even though they have no reason to suspect a crime has taken place. Courts have decided that police can randomly check license plates because drivers should not and do not have an expectation of privacy concerning their license plates.
4) Carola Angelen requested your answer to this
The very first records that of crime photography, (a.k.a. forensic photography) in the U.K. was in England in the 1850s. Previous to this, any manner of police based photography dates back to 1843-44 in Belgium. With pictures ranging from mug shots to prisoners in their cells, they originated the practice of implementing photographic documentation of prison inmates. The problem back then was that there was no specialized training required and pictures were often taken by anyone with a camera, even policemen, guards or prison officials.
In the 1890’s, the French photographer, Alphonse Bertillon was the first to recognize that regular photography methods were futile for identification of suspects. Bertillon was also key in developing crime photography that involved documenting the scene of the crime, rather than the criminal. Bertillon is responsible for radical changes in forensic photography including taking pictures of the victim (scars, wounds, birthmarks, etc.) for the purpose of identification or conviction; as well as capturing the crime scene, the placement of objects, the position of a body, photographing evidence and fingerprints.
Crime photographer, Arthur “Weegee” Fellig, further changed forensic photography by routinely arriving at crime scenes before other reporters, many times before the police. He established the practice of the CSI being the first investigators to the scene.
3) Mark-Anthony Canty requested your answer to this
Leo Dennis Kozlowski was the CEO of Tyco International, a security systems company, (not the toy people) from 1992 until 2002. Kozlowski was convicted in 2005 of crimes related to his receipt of $81 million in unauthorized bonuses, the purchase of art for $14.725 million and the payment by Tyco of a $20 million investment banking fee to Frank Walsh, a former Tyco director.
When Kozlowski became CEO, Tyco experienced a sharp resurgence and massively expanded during the late 1990s. As Tyco became more and more successful, CEO Kozlowski brokered himself a massive salary package as well as a generous commission with a bonus structure that was unheard of at that time. The CEO’s extravagant lifestyle his compensation became public knowledge in the early 2000s. Due to Kozlowski living a life of sheer excess eyebrows were raised and questions asked.
The question was never “if” he received the money. The question was if he received the money in accordance with his pre-established compensation package. Kozlowski left Tyco in 2002 amidst the controversy concerning allegations.
The question was and still remains had Kozlowski actually broken any laws? His fate was determined; not by a judge holding him to the letter of the law but by a jury that saw a man sitting in a courtroom making $100 million a year, living a life that most, if not all envied. His original trial ended in a mistrial. His second found him convicted on 22 counts of grand larceny, falsifying business records, securities fraud and conspiracy. Dennis Kozlowski may have spent almost 9 years of his life in prison from simply being hated on.
2) David Nelson requested your answer to this
I believe that the biggest myth about crime is that only certain people are more susceptible to committing crimes then others. Or that there is some crime consortium that sits in a dark room somewhere and just plot crimes. Any person of any race, creed, color, nationality or religious belief can be deemed a criminal at some point given the right (or wrong) set of circumstances. Crime is described as any act that is an infraction of laws established and accepted by a people or society. How many times have you crossed the street on a red light or popped a grape in your mouth while grocery shopping? On YouTube there are countless videos of pranks gone wrong that turned otherwise law abiding citizens into criminals.
Those who participate in crime as an income or way of life; do the exact same things that everyone else does. They shop at the same stores, eat at the same restaurants, worship at the same churches, temples and synagogues and have the same hopes and dreams for their children. People that I know that engage in criminal acts as a means for survival do so with the sincerest wish that their children do not have to make the same choices in life.
Understand that I do not excuse anyone for criminal acts. Those that participate in such lifestyles, (especially those that use any manner of violence) should be prosecuted by law. I do wish to bring a level of understanding and shed some light on a popular misconception. No person lives a completely good or evil life. We all have our faults, vices, and shortcomings and none of us are perfect. It only takes one moment of indiscretion; a momentary lapse of judgment to change the course of one’s life; forever.
1) Josh Knight requested your answer to this
Damn good question. The lowest point of my prison life came when I finally woke up and realized just who I was as well as who my decisions are affecting.
In prison, as long as people are sending you money and letters regularly; prison is a breeze. As long as you are getting attention from people in the world, your prison popularity rises and you become the prison equivalent of one the “cool kids” in high school. However, when the money and letters stopped, like a spoiled bitch I called home cussing and demanding money.
After about 2 months of not receiving anything and feeling sorry for myself, I came to the painful reality that nobody owes me anything. It was my greed, selfishness and stupidity that put me in this situation. I was taking advantage of people that cared for me and making demands that I had no right to make. Every dime that was being sent me had to come from somewhere, usually my children. Instead of worrying about maintaining a façade of being a “baller” around people that I wouldn’t even know out in the world, I should be at home raising my children; teaching them how not to end up like this.
I sank into a period of depression and self-loathing. By writing, I gradually worked myself out of that mental state. I developed a “to do list”; a game plan created to keep myself from repeating the same comedy of errors that landed me in the penitentiary. That low point probably saved my life. By arriving at that point in my life I realized that I could only go up from there.
Everyone has a lowest point. The point in which we rise up to go forth and achieve our goals. However, we must be cautious, many times we think we’ve hit our lowest point; only to find that you’ve only hit a false bottom.